Tagged: planets

Question: om shanti , we have sustained life on planet earth which is repeating means “nothing new”, then what abt. the existance other celestial bodies in the vast universe , what is there reason for existance ? does they follow the same law of repeatation for the matter exist on them ? can baba`s gyan can explain there survival in universe and does have any possibility of existance of life far from earth ?

Thank you for your question!
Dear soul,
There are in this site a couple of articles that will help to clarify this.
The one below, is about how “collective consciousness,” will allow us to understand and perceive things in a particular way. Let us remember that reality as such is only a perception of it. This is supported by Gyan, for we need to remember that our “perceived” intelligence is nothing but just a role. Through that role is how we perceive the Universe.

http://bkgyan.com/2013/01/16/the-5000-year-cycle-and-the-quest-for-proof-according-to-our-consciousness/

According to Gyan, there is no human life outside the Earth. Here is where the Drama occurs.

Scientific knowledge in astronomy is pretentious at this time. As explained in the articles below, even movements of planets around the Earth are not understood. If you add the “new” knowledge of quantum physics, that will complicate matters about topics such as location of celestial bodies. All we have are just theories based on our “research tools” which are extensions of our physical senses. Those theories are changing and will change. However, we just need to remember that “there is a role” running through us which will make us understand things in a certain manner.

http://bkgyan.com/category/scientific-tales/

Through Gyan, we know that a “big bang” is impossible. That expansion of matter as a consequence of that initial explosion then, is doubtful.
If people “choose” to believe in an initial explosion as the origin of the Universe, “proofs” will be available for that. However, NO ONE has been able to come up with the answer as to how those elements (Hydrogen and helium, scientists tell us) got there in the first place to create the explosion. Who created them? Do we need a God creating things out of nothing to help them out? For me that is a basic logic flaw.

One more item. There is no “reason” for existence. Existence is what always has been existing. If matter exists in other places besides the Earth, then the same laws should apply and that is that matter cannot be created neither destroyed. It only transforms. Basic law which many times we forget. It is a cyclical transformation of matter.

Best wishes!

Scientific tales: Why do we use science as the yardstick for truth?

This will be the last article for now on the “Scientific tales” section. The purpose of these articles is to be informed as to demonstrate that scientific knowledge does not reflect truth but rather, a search for answers.

Many times we use “science,” as a way to defy or even shutdown different ideas and philosophies which are non traditional.
We use Science as “truth,” we have been indoctrinated to believe so.

My interest in science grew when I was interested in the topic of time, which is completely misunderstood by science. As a matter of fact, despite all the scientific “progress,” the topic of time remains as one of those untouchable topics which science hasn’t been able to understand. Want a sample?
https://explore7.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/time.pdf Case closed. Add the second law (entropy) here to make things difficult and we will have several explanations, theories without truthful answers.

What about the age of the Universe?
According to scientists a “baby could be older than his own parents.” 🙂
This is an article by a bona fide Ph.D in physics as far as I know.
http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=241424
What about the planet’s orbits around the Sun?
According to what I was taught as a “truth” the planets had an elliptical and predictable orbit around the Sun. Here is a video with that scientific “truth.”

Now, we can understand that the path of the planets around the Sun is not a predicted path which repeats every time as when the Earth goes around the Sun… It is a spiral…


For those of us who ever thought that the platonic time of 26,000 years would dismiss an “eternally repeating cycle of 5000 years,” it would be good to reconsider; for we are relying on our point of reference or observation being the Earth and we are just beginning to understand that there are many different movements in the celestial bodies. For instance the Earth moves around its own axis and the spiral movement around the Sun is not the same pattern nor the same degree in space, for the Earth does not move in “flatland.” Similarly what we observe on a distant star, is merely subjective according to our position in space.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_precession.htm

Moreover, as “it is above so it is below,” therefore, celestial bodies merely reflect the behavior of atomic particles, which we are just beginning to understand under a scientific perspective.

There is a lot to be desired from Science.
Here is one question I sent a group of astronomers sometime ago for their enlightened answer:

wrote:

Thank you for your question to Ask an Astronomer. It will be forwarded to one of our team members to answer.

Question:
“1) The Big Bang. We have extremely strong evidence that the universe as we know it had a beginning, that everything which we can think of, matter and space alike, started off compressed together and has been expanding ever since.”

This is a quote from the question here:

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=231

My question: What was the beginning of the Universe? What is the “extremely strong evidence that you have”?

If in fact was an explosion, how the elements which produced the explosion got there? Isn’t this like solving the riddle “who is first the chicken or the egg”?

Finally, How this “extremely strong evidence,” is able to counteract modern views of the “origin” of the Universe cited by scientists like Neil Turok, Paul Frampton and other cyclic models of the universe?

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/03/there-was-no-big-bang-universe-endlessly-expands-contracts.html

Thank you.

No answer so far.

Finally, I recommend this link for a different view and “research” on what we have believed to be the “true” history of the world.

Question: i wanted to know that are these “kundli” & “planets” really exist or not…do all these effects our life or not.. since all these shastra are written by us only… so are these horoscope & kundli & planets affecting us, all this is true or not….?

Great question. Thank you. 🙂

According to gyan, there is a Drama and there is an inter-relationship of everything that exists. Nothing exists in isolation.

I would urge yo to read this article:.
I believe it is well written and can give you some light in your question.

Also, I recommend reading this article as well for counter balance. It is the western “scientific” mind behind it.

In my experience, what we perceive as “affecting us,” it is just part of a perception of the Drama. If we watch TV. That is affecting us as well. The difference is when we have gyan, we know why and we know how to “counteract that” based on knowledge. (Pure wishes, good feelings, settlement of karmic accounts, yoga and the recognition that I am a soul and that I should be the master of the senses.)

We need to go beyond that by the recognition of our eternal nature.

Best wishes!