The above quotes mention one of the universal spiritual “truths,” that is: If you give, you receive.

That line has been used by many spiritual teachers without further explanation.

How does it work?

In the last writing about “We do what we are,” it was mentioned that there is an inner being (soul) who is part of the “whole,” that universal “spirit” is known as the Drama, the Tao, or the Creation. (depending on your religious beliefs) That is life in itself.

That “soul” by itself has no awareness of duality. Has no awareness of separation from anything.

When that “soul” has a role to perform in life; then the awareness of individuality arises as the soul identifies with the uniqueness of a body. Then, a personality is developed. From One, many appear.

Note how the primal absence of knowing the concepts of “you and Me,” change and develop into that separation as we know it.

A role in life, goes through the awareness of a soul as “me.” Then automatically, “you” arises.

Many religious and spiritual teachings have taught, “giving is receiving,” with the assumption that we are “separate.” Then, a selfish motive of acquiring for the self is corrected when the “moral standard” of being “good” is taught.

That is “share with others.” “Give to others.”

Nothing wrong with those teachings, but in a deeper view we can see that there is no “self” neither the “other” unless we identify with the body and the role in life.

That identification is an illusion, which separates, something that is One from the beginning. But it could be experienced as “many” as “you and me,” only if our consciousness does not allow us to see that both “One,” and “many” are valid perspectives.

Thus, whatever “I” do, will come back to “me,” for there is no “other.”

A “soul” performing a role in life accomplishes that through a thought, which will materialize in the physical world as an “action.”

That is what we know as “karma.” That activity could be colored by egoless-ness, which is lack of expectation and desires; that is “without individuality” or it could be full of ego.
The return of ego is further separation. That means, suffering.

Once we understand that egoless “doing” is truly harmony with the original oneness; then the “other” merely is a “mirror” for lack of a better name.

The actions we perform, are the seed transforming into a flower. We will eat that fruit sooner or later. The fruit is already latent in the seed.

That is why, according to how we ARE, would be the quality of our activities.

We cannot “do” good actions, if we are not “good.”

Activities by itself do not have a moral standard. Moral standards are made up by a society engulfed in duality.

Someone in harmony with the whole, with that Drama of life; works as an ego-less agent of “doing.” He could only do “good,” for as he is; so are his activities.

Let us say that a dentist “falls in love” with one of his patients.
Dr. Drill likes Rose so much, that he gave her a “huge” break for the cost of his dental services.
Dr. Drill would go to the extremes of showing his care for Rose.

Obviously, Dr, Drill had an expectation. He wanted Rose to return his “love.”

Because Dr. Drill’s activities are not “self-less,” Dr. Drill opened himself for the experience of duality.

If Rose responds positively to Dr. Drill’s approach; then Dr. Drill will be “happy.” At the same time, Dr. Drill would learn a new “proven” way to manipulate people, which will have a 50-50 chance of working with “most people.” Those activities will bring their own consequence for manipulation is not a “good deed.”

If Dr. Drill is rejected. Then, Dr. Drill will be “unhappy” and disappointed and with that his “love,” could turn around into “hate.” Note that duality.

On the other hand, a “self-less” approach has no consequence other than enhancing that sense of Selfless-ness, which will come back to Dr. Drill; enhancing his well being beyond duality. That is spiritual happiness.

The seed was there, it produced a flower and the fruit will be eaten by the one who let that seed appear.